SilverlightShow: Deep Dive Into WCF Part 2: Serialization on the speed of light with Google Protocol Buffers Comments

wedding

( wedding) — Fri, 11 Jun 2010 10:48:24 +0300

supply in stock and custom lace front wigs, full lace wigs, lace wigs, human hair wigs, remy lace front wigs, cheap wigs, cheap, buy, celebrity full lace wigs lace wigs lace wigs sale lace front wigs synthetic front lace wigs Full Lace Front Wig, Long & Short Hair Wigs: 80% OFF at Celebrity Wigs. We ensure 100% customer satisfaction with our Long & Short Indian Remy Hair Wigs. wedding dresses evening dresses prom dresses

RE: Deep Dive Into WCF Part 2: Serialization on the speed of light with Google Protocol Buffers

( Piers Lawson) — Sun, 14 Feb 2010 04:32:40 +0300

Interesting stuff... I may add support for the google protocol to my ASP.Net MVC RESTful implementation:

http://shouldersofgiants.co.uk/blog

RE: Deep Dive Into WCF Part 2: Serialization on the speed of light with Google Protocol Buffers

( Alexey Z) — Tue, 22 Dec 2009 20:17:20 +0300

HttpContext contains user of ASP.NET membership so u can use it directly of with MVC fliters. Haven't work with SSL cannot say you anything about it.

RE: Deep Dive Into WCF Part 2: Serialization on the speed of light with Google Protocol Buffers

( RadenkoZec) — Tue, 22 Dec 2009 20:12:28 +0300

Is there a problem if we want for example SSL and some advanced authentification and authorization because we are using REST?

RE: Deep Dive Into WCF Part 2: Serialization on the speed of light with Google Protocol Buffers

( Alexey Z.) — Tue, 22 Dec 2009 19:58:25 +0300

You can look at Marc Gravell tests. I've mentioned them in the article.

There would be no problems with real world.

The only thing I missed in PB is that there is not generic method for deserialization. Also it is not possible out of the box to deserialize entity by typename. But do we really need this in web service?

RE: Deep Dive Into WCF Part 2: Serialization on the speed of light with Google Protocol Buffers

( RadenkoZec) — Tue, 22 Dec 2009 19:52:26 +0300

Great article. I am really impressed...

1) Can you give us some tests about performance of your solution comparing with classic WCF web service?

2) Have you considered your solution for real world LOB application? Can you point out weakness of your solution when using it to build LOB application?

Thanks